Wyoming OGCC Reporting
One source of truth for Wyoming OGCC across SCADA, accounting, and well tests.
Wyoming operators carry three workflows on the same underlying data: monthly production filings to the OGCC, well-test cadence tracking, and condensate allocation from centralized gas plants. WorkSync runs all three from one Data Hub pipeline. PRB, Greater Green River, and DJ-Wyoming operators see the same metric: analyst hours cut by 60 percent or more.
Why one source of truth matters
Definition
What does the Wyoming OGCC require?
The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission requires monthly production reporting for every active well. Operators report oil, gas, condensate, and water volumes by well, sales disposition, and well-test data at the OGCC-required cadence. The agency accepts several upload formats and operates a separate workflow for well-test reporting and centralized-plant condensate allocation.
Wyoming differs from Texas or Oklahoma in two practical ways. Centralized gas processing is common (PRB wet gas, Greater Green River condensate-rich gas) and the allocation rules are specific to Wyoming. Well-test cadence is enforced more actively than in some peer states, so missed tests show up as agency notices rather than internal audit findings.
Where Wyoming OGCC reporting breaks
Four failure modes specific to WY operators.
Multi-format submissions
The OGCC accepts several upload formats. Operators with mixed asset history end up maintaining two or three separate pipelines into the same agency. When the OGCC updates a format, every pipeline needs revisiting. Most teams find out by failed submission.
Well-test reporting cadence
The OGCC requires well-test reporting at a frequency that catches a lot of operators by surprise. Wells fall behind, the operator gets a notice, and they spend a sprint catching up on tests that should have been routine. No central tracker means it happens again next year.
Centralized-plant condensate allocation
PRB and Greater Green River operators with wet-gas production routed to a centralized processing plant have to allocate plant condensate back to producing wells. The allocation method matters: gas-volume-weighted, BTU-weighted, well-test-derived, and the rules are not the same as in Texas or Oklahoma.
Three workflows for the same data
The volumes that feed OGCC reporting also feed Wyoming severance tax (ad valorem and conservation tax), federal reporting where applicable (BLM-administered acreage), and royalty distribution. Maintaining three separate workflows on the same underlying data means three places to drift.
How WorkSync automates it
Four steps from production to filed OGCC report.
- 1Data Hub pulls every input
Production volumes from Enertia, Quorum, W Energy, PakEnergy, or Oildex. Meter data from SCADA (Cygnet, AVEVA, OSIsoft PI, Ignition). Well-test data from production accounting or the WorkSync field-data capture app. Gas plant accounting for condensate allocation.
- 2Condensate allocation engine applies the right method
For wet-gas operators with centralized processing, the allocation engine splits plant condensate back to producing wells using your declared method. The allocation factor is preserved as audit trail and applied consistently across OGCC, severance tax, and revenue distribution.
- 3Well-test cadence tracker surfaces deadlines
Every well carries its OGCC-required next-test date. The tracker surfaces wells approaching the deadline 30, 14, and 7 days out so the field team can sequence tests into normal routes rather than scramble after a notice.
- 4Submit in the right OGCC format
WorkSync builds the OGCC submission in the format you file in. Submit through the OGCC portal or export the file. The filing plus the reconciliation audit trail is archived for future amendments and audits.
Related work
Wyoming operators use WorkSync for more than reporting.
Other state reporting
State production reports we automate
Wyoming-relevant
Wyoming operator playbooks
Frequently asked
What Wyoming operators ask about OGCC automation.
What does the Wyoming OGCC require operators to file?
The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission requires monthly production reporting for every active well. Operators report oil, gas, condensate, and water volumes by well, sales disposition, and well-test data on the OGCC-required cadence. Additional rules govern condensate allocation when wet gas is processed at a centralized plant.
Why is Wyoming OGCC reporting harder than it looks?
Multi-format submissions, well-test cadence tracking, and centralized-plant condensate allocation. Operators with mixed asset history maintain several pipelines; well-test deadlines catch teams by surprise; PRB and Greater Green River condensate allocation rules differ from Texas or Oklahoma.
How does WorkSync automate Wyoming OGCC?
Data Hub pulls volumes from production accounting, meter data from SCADA, and well-test data from production accounting or the field-data capture app. The reporting engine assembles the OGCC submission, applies condensate allocation factors, and reconciles against prior-period balances. Well-test cadence is tracked per well with alerts.
Does this handle PRB condensate allocation?
Yes. PRB operators with wet-gas production routed to a centralized plant have to allocate plant condensate back to producing wells. WorkSync supports gas-volume-weighted, BTU-weighted, and well-test-derived methods and preserves the factor as audit trail across OGCC, severance tax, and revenue distribution.
How fast can Wyoming OGCC automation deploy?
Two weeks to integrate. Four weeks to live filing under the Impact Guarantee. We anchor on analyst hours per cycle and elimination of late well-test variances.
Run OGCC, severance tax, and condensate allocation from one pipeline.
4-week pilot, Impact Guarantee. If we do not cut analyst hours per cycle 60 percent or more, you owe nothing.