Customer outcomes
Same crew. Same wells. 15% more free cash flow.
Measured, live deployment · same crew
Measured, live deployment · same production coverage
Deployment figures measured across 5,000+ wells in live operations at a top 25 private producer. Results are not projections. What transfers to your operation is exactly what the pilot measures.
The transformation
Five things about the operating pattern changed. Each one is a mechanism.
After column, in order: deployment figure, same production coverage; ranking behavior, not a published statistic; ranking behavior, not a published statistic; deployment figures on the covered tank-battery population; system behavior. The full labeled set, with the method behind each number, is on the numbers page.
Before
The operating pattern, before anything is ranked.
- 01
Routes are drawn once and then repeated
A route built around geography and visit frequency sends a crew past the same wells on the same weekday for years. It is stable, it is easy to staff, and it spends the same hour on a well making 4 barrels and a well making 400. The economics of the stop never enter the decision, because the decision was made when the route was drawn.Documented in Optimal Route Planning in Oil and Gas → - 02
Exceptions arrive faster than anyone can price them
Exception-based monitoring is a real advance, and it hits a ceiling: it tells a control room that something changed, at a rate no control room can triage. The exceptions arrive with no dollars attached, so the ones that get worked are the loud ones, the familiar ones, and the ones nearest the truck.Documented in Taking Pump by Exception to the Next Level → - 03
Priority is a person, not a system
Somebody senior reads the alarms, the downtime report, the work-order backlog, and the engineering recommendations, and decides the day. That judgment is genuinely good. It also gets triaged from memory, covers the wells one person can hold in their head, and walks out the door on the day that person retires.Documented in Taking Pump by Exception to the Next Level → - 04
Each class of work is planned on its own
A shift carries six different classes of work at once: scheduled maintenance, reactive failure response, regulatory inspection under a hard deadline, risk-based proactive visits, liquid management, and routine information collection. Each has its own time windows, its own cost of deferring it, and its own qualification requirements, and each is tracked where it originates. The couplings between them are what nobody plans: a hauler dispatched late induces a well shut-in, and an electrician routed first is what lets a workover proceed.Documented in Optimal Route Planning in Oil and Gas → - 05
The result shows up too late to change anything
Field activity reaches the numbers at month close, and the discovery that a high-value well sat compromised while crews worked nuisance items arrives billing cycles later. Every close-out held the answer to whether that exception was worth the visit, and in a classical deployment that answer goes nowhere, so the queue in year five is no smarter than the queue in year one.Documented in Taking Pump by Exception to the Next Level →

The intervention
One loop, running every night and every shift.
- 01
Flag
Signals from the systems of record become one reconciled exception per well. - 02
Price
Every exception carries dollars per day at risk, not a severity color. - 03
Rank
Priced work competes against all other open work on one economic ruler. - 04
Route
The ranked list becomes a drivable day inside the real constraints. - 05
Execute
The crew works the plan and closes it out where the plan lives. - 06
Learn
Close-outs return to the ranking, and the accrual is booked with the work.
The ranked plan the crew sees by 6 AM: the morning's work, each item carrying its dollars per day at risk and the reason it ranked where it did. 148 wells, one morning. Synthetic demo data, generated.
What goes in, and what the engine does with it
DataHub reads SCADA, the historian, production accounting, the CMMS, and the well master, and reconciles them into one record per well. The prioritization engine scores every open exception and every open job on that record: production at risk in dollars per day, probability that an intervention recovers it, equipment condition, safety and regulatory constraints, crew capability, and drive time. Severity color and time in a queue describe an exception. Dollars order the day.
Route Optimization then turns the ranked list into a day. Value density leads, and the solver works inside the real constraints: hours available, qualification to do the job, access and road conditions, and the jobs that have to happen regardless of what they earn. Work priced below the economics of a visit is logged and watched rather than driven to.
The ranked list, sequenced into a drivable day
Crew A’s day
7 stops · 2h 39m driving · $10,331/d
Drive is modelled inside a synthetic field, not measured on real roads. Synthetic demo data, generated.
What closes the loop
The crew works the plan on the same surface the plan arrives on, and closes it out there: what was found, what was done, the readings taken, the volumes captured. That close-out does two jobs at once. It books the accrual with the work instead of at month close, and it returns to the engine as evidence, so the next ranking knows which interventions actually recovered production on which equipment in which conditions.
That is the part that compounds. A ranking that learns from its own close-outs gets better every week it runs, and the judgment it accumulates belongs to the operation rather than to any one person in it.
The scoring, routing, and learning mechanisms above are documented in full in the four WorkSync white papers, now published in their entirety: Pump by Priority, Optimal Route Planning, Taking Pump by Exception to the Next Level, and Automated Hydraulic Model Builds.
After
Measured in the field. Not modeled in a spreadsheet.
Standard rollout on the productized platform: crews live in 4 weeks
Modeled, and kept separate on purpose
Recovering deferred production is worth a 2 to 5% production uplift. That figure is modeled, aligned to the published Alvarez and Marsal worked example rather than quoted from it, and it sits outside the measured tiles above for exactly that reason. The mechanism behind it is the ranking itself: deferral priced in dollars at risk, and recovery work dispatched biggest dollars first.
About the customer: a top 25 private producer running 5,000+ wells across the Western Anadarko, Permian, and Wyoming. WorkSync publishes the scale, the basins, and the measured figures, and keeps the name confidential at the customer’s request. Every number on this page appears with its measurement basis on the numbers page. Results are not projections, and what transfers to your operation is exactly what the pilot measures.
Deployment one took 12 weeks; the productized platform now stands up in 4.
That first rollout carried custom integration work for each basin, with basin one live at week 4 and all three basins on the same loop by week 12. Everything learned in those 12 weeks is now product. On today’s platform the cadence is fixed: week 1 connect the data, week 2 configure and rank, week 3 put the plan in the field, week 4 measure the result.
A second deployment
The same pattern, applied to engineering work.
A build that consumed weeks of document archaeology and manual entry compresses to minutes of verification.
Gathering and transmission mileage reconciled into the model inventory, with models, data, and studies flowing through one platform.
Common questions
Questions about these outcomes
Who is the customer behind these outcomes?
Are these outcomes measured or modeled?
Did the field organization grow to produce these results?
How long did the deployment take?
Did the operator replace SCADA, CMMS, or production accounting to get this?
What part of this transfers to my operation?
Go deeper
The record, the numbers, and the method behind them.
- Case studyThe 3-Basin Deployment RecordThe same deployment week by week: kickoff, integration, first ranked plan, basins two and three, steady state.
- Case studyThe NumbersEvery figure WorkSync publishes, with its provenance label and the method behind it.
- GuidePump by PriorityThe white paper behind the economic ruler: scoring, ranking, and the closed loop, in full.
- GuideOptimal Route PlanningWhy the most profitable route beats the shortest one, and how the constraints are solved.
What would your field work on tomorrow?
Bring one field’s data. We rank the work, we show you the economics, and you decide whether it is worth doing. License fees start when your number moves.